雅思英语作文教育类1 Itisoftensaidthatthesubjectstaughtinschoolsaretooacademicinorientationandthatitwouldbem下面是小编为大家整理的雅思英语作文教育类,菁选2篇,供大家参考。
雅思英语作文教育类1
It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical * such as home management, work and interpersonal skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
A criticism often heard these days is that the subjects taught in schools tend to be too academic, and contribute little to preparing a young person for the real-life tasks he or she will have to perform after graduation. They say that academic subjects are rooted in the past, and are not useful for solving modern problems. I disagree with this point of view for three reasons.
My first reason is that it is the duty of parents, not teachers, to prepare their children to deal with the practical affairs of life. The home, not the classroom, is the ideal place to learn about home management and interpersonal skills. As for work abilities and attitudes, they are best learned “on the job” and under the supervision of an experienced older worker.
My second reason is that academic subjects have withstood the test of time. They represent the accumulated wisdom of our ancestors down through the ages, and, far from being impractical, they equip us with the knowledge and confidence to make sound judgements about any problems which may crop up. In addition, academic subjects are good for training us in mental discipline, while practical subjects are weak in this regard.
My third reason is based on the saying “Man does not live by bread alone.” Schooldays devoted solely to instruction in down-to-earth practical * would be dull indeed! Lessons in the best literature of the world, and the epoch-making scientific and geographical discoveries of the past enrich our lives and make us feel that we are part of the great family of mankind.
All in all, the teaching of academic subjects in schools is entirely appropriate. It is my firmly held view that practical subjects have no place in the classroom. On the contrary, the curriculum should be more academic!
雅思英语作文教育类2
Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
Today, education has become a priority for many parents seeking to secure a good future for their children in this rapidly changing world. They believe that if their children ap* themselves and work hard at school, then they will increase their opportunities for going to higher education and eventually getting a good job. Of course they are right, and as access to the best education and best jobs is becoming more competitive, then it is true that children have to make the best of their study time when they are young.
However, the parents who do not allow their children sufficient free time for leisure activities outside school hours, are misguided. Such activities are far from being a waste of time for the children sim* because they are not academic. It is important to remember that children need to develop skills other than intellectual ones, and the best way to do this is through activities such as sports, games and playing with other kids. If they cannot play make-believe games, how can they develop their imagination? How can they learn physical co-ordination or learn important social lessons about winning and losing if they do not practise any sports? Many children form strong, personal relationships with the friends they play with, and without the opportunity to do this, they could grow up emotionally immature or unformed.
Finally, I think it is also important to remember that children need to relax as well as work. If everything they do must have some educational or academic relevance, then they will soon get tired of studying altogether, which is the last thing parents would want.
推荐访问:雅思 作文 英语 雅思英语作文教育类 菁选2篇 雅思英语作文教育类1 教育类雅思作文范文 雅思教育类作文题目汇总
本文来源：https://www.dho8.com/fanwendaquan/gongwenfanwen/67998.html